Mis-sold Investment Specialists - Call For a Free Expert Claims Assessment
0808 163 1659

Back to blog overview

What was Global Forestry?

Published on:

Global Forestry was a SIPP investment scheme that many pension holders in the UK invested in. They did so because of the promise of healthy returns and because the investment was labelled as being green, i.e. they were investing in something that would make them money and that was also good for the environment.

Things didn’t go well, though. In fact, it was disastrous for the pension holders involved as most of them got nothing back from Global Forestry investment – not even their original investment.

What was Global Forestry and what went wrong?

The Pitch to Investors to Transfer Their Pension to a Global Forestry SIPP Product

Investors who purchased the Global Forestry SIPP product were told they were investing in teak plantations. There were two teak plantations, in fact, both in Brazil – Belem Sky and Para Sky.

Those who invested were told they would be leasing a plot of land at one of these plantations. Timber management companies would then lease the plots from the investors to manage the land and grow teak trees.

The Investment

To invest in Global Forestry, you had to commit a minimum of £5,000 into the scheme.

In total, £24 million was invested. Not all of this was by people purchasing a Global Forestry SIPP product, but a large proportion was.

The Promise to Investors

Investors were first of all told they were investing in a sustainable scheme, i.e. a scheme devoted to regenerating forests in Brazil while also producing a renewable resource.

The investors were also told to expect returns of up to 20 percent per year. In addition, they were told they would get a minimum annual return of 10 percent

The Failure of the Scheme

The company, Global Forestry Investments, went into compulsory liquidation in 2014. It was also investigated by the Insolvency Service and other agencies. Following these investigations, the directors of Global Forestry were disqualified from being company directors as a result of the way they ran the company and managed the scheme

Unfortunately for those who bought into the scheme, the investigators found little evidence of returns to investors.

Issues from the Start

It’s unclear exactly what caused the Global Forestry investment to fail. One thing we do know is that investigators highlighted the unusual use of investors’ money, including the fact that £13 million was paid into the personal bank accounts of the company’s directors.

Whatever the reasons for the failure, though, the total returns to investors amounted to just £710k from an original pool of over £24 million.

An Example of SIPP Product Miss-Selling

Many of those who transferred their pension into a Global Forestry SIPP may have been the victim of miss-selling. This is primarily because Global Forestry was an unregulated investment.

This means it was a high-risk investment, so should only have been offered by financial advisors to experienced and knowledgeable investors. In general, investors that fall into this category are also high net worth individuals.

As most people investing their pension into a SIPP are neither high net worth individuals nor experienced investors, miss-selling may have occurred when they bought into Global Forestry.

Might this apply to you? If you think so, you should get advice on the steps you may be able to take.

Request a call back

If you'd like us to call, please fill in your details

Why choose us?

  • Hassle-free process.
  • No lengthy paperwork to complete.
  • Your own dedicated claims expert.
  • Claims settled within 8 weeks on average.
More About Us

Speak to our friendly experts

If you feel you've been let down by your bank or financial adviser please call us.

Call today 0808 163 1659

Customer Stories

We've helped thousands of people win compensation as a result of unsuitable financial advice.

William Thornley I’m absolutely delighted with the service we got from Goodwin Barrett, I couldn’t believe how easy it was and i’ve nothing but praise for them
Alan Parton This was an excellent result which my wife and I never expected. My sincere thanks to you for such an excellent achievement, I cannot thank you enough
Stuart Snowden After sending a report to Santander, they agreed with our findings and awarded Mr Snowden an amount of £7,000 made up from a refund of the losses together with interest and compensation.
William Miller This was a fantastic result I never expected. My sincere thanks for such a prompt and efficient service.
Margaret Long I am so grateful to your company but especially to Steve Wise for getting me the money back
Janet Rynkiewicz We reported our findings to Halifax and within a matter of weeks had secured our client the sum of £26,700 in compensation.
Fred Hardman After we sent a detailed complaint to Halifax, Fred was delighted to receive £6,916 from the bank in a matter of weeks.
Stephen Montague Having investigated the complaint Lloyds TSB agreed that the advice was unsuitable and agreed to pay the clients £10,000.

Figures shown are before the deduction of our fee.